Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515280 Jussi Lehtola <jussi.leht...@iki.fi> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.leht...@iki.fi --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.leht...@iki.fi> 2009-08-07 08:14:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Hello Michal, > > your package is pretty clean. The only thing I'm not quite sure about is the > license. The Website mentions GPL v2 but there is no version number given in > README and AUTHORS. Maybe you can ask upstream if GPLv2+ is also applicable. The first priority is the source code. In this case: $ grep -i license * -R gives a bunch of gnome-colors-common/scalable/devices/gnome-dev-symlink.svg: <cc:license gnome-colors-common/scalable/devices/gnome-dev-symlink.svg: rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/GPL/2.0/"; /> gnome-colors-common/scalable/devices/gnome-dev-symlink.svg: <cc:License gnome-colors-common/scalable/devices/gnome-dev-symlink.svg: rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/GPL/2.0/";> gnome-colors-common/scalable/devices/gnome-dev-symlink.svg: </cc:License> so the license is clearly GPLv2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
