Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518310 Alexander Kurtakov <akurt...@redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |akurt...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org |akurt...@redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov <akurt...@redhat.com> 2009-08-20 10:58:14 EDT --- Formal review: OK: rpmlint gives only no-conffile-in-etc for the maven pom. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK: LICENSE.txt included as %doc. OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK: Instructions for retrieving sources aded. OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17] OK: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. Javadoc subpackage. OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. PK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. The package is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review