Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518449 Michel Alexandre Salim <michael.silva...@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michael.silva...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org |michael.silva...@gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Michel Alexandre Salim <michael.silva...@gmail.com> 2009-08-21 19:10:46 EDT --- Everything is fine here. APPROVED. MUST • rpmlint: OK • package name: OK • spec file name: OK • package guideline-compliant: OK • license complies with guidelines: OK • license field accurate: OK • license file not deleted: OK • spec in US English: OK • spec legible: OK • source matches upstream: OK (MD5 sum: df86408bf2291bbe01d9277217f68901) • builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded: OK (Koji) • build dependencies complete: OK (Koji) • locales handled using %find_lang, no %{_datadir}/locale: OK • own all directories: OK • no dupes in %files: OK • permission: OK • %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT: OK • macros used consistently: OK • Package contains code: OK • clean buildroot before install: OK • filenames UTF-8: OK SHOULD • package build in mock on all architectures: OK (Koji) • package functioned as described: OK • scriplets are sane: OK • require package not files: OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
