Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510255





--- Comment #15 from Victor G. Vasilyev <victor.vasil...@sun.com>  2009-08-23 
11:44:21 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Is there any particular reason you packaged this version as opposed to the
> latest version?
There is only one significant reason the version 1.9 was tested together with
the NetBeans 6.7.1.

> I was specifically after creating "summaryXml" format reports,
> but I see now that option is only available in Cobertura >= 1.9.1  
You can discuss inclusion of the latest version to the NetBeans here: 
mailto:nbus...@netbeans.org
mailto:us...@codecoverage.netbeans.org

I'm sure if the new features of the Cobertura will be valuable for community
then the latest version will be used by the NetBeans and the version, of
course, will be included in Fedora. Note, we are not far from the NetBeans 6.8.

AFAIU the main point to use "summaryXml" is based on existence of a large
project under test. There are many users of the NetBeans who has working on
very large projects. You can find support from their side in voting against RFE
filed  here: http://www.netbeans.org/issues

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to