Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-28 00:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #66) > Excellent to hear some positive testing reports both here and on the lists. Thanks to all whot tested this package. > > In reply to comment #63: > > It looks like the libgutenprintui libraries in the main package need gtk > libgutenprintui.so.1 > libgutenprintui2.so.1 > > I don't know if they can be split off or not... Parag? I don't think we should split them and create a new package. Those are part of gutenprint-devel package. And as all *.so.1 files must go to -devel packages, ther are already there. > > Parag: > > - Can you apply something like the changes from comment #58 with a proper > changelog entry and upload a new spec/src.rpm? Will do that later today. > > - I just did another fc6/x86_64 build here and it worked. Either the problem > I > was seeing before was something that was temp broken in devel, or there is > some > kind of race condition in the build process that I managed to hit. > > - Can you also add '--disable-rpath' to the configure call? This shows up on > x86_64 rpmlint as: > E: gutenprint binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath > /usr/lib64/libgutenprintui.so.1.0.0 > ['/usr/lib64'] > E: gutenprint binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/ > libgutenprintui2.so.1.0.0 ['/usr/lib64'] > E: gutenprint binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/ijsgutenprint.5.0 ['/usr/ > lib64'] > E: gutenprint-cups binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/sbin/cups-genppd.5.0 ['/ > usr/lib64'] > E: gutenprint-cups binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/cups/filter/ > rastertogutenprint.5.0 ['/usr/lib64'] > E: gutenprint-extras binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/testpattern > ['/usr/ > lib64'] > Kevin, Sure will add --disable-rpath to ./configure in SPEC. So same %{_libdir} macro worked for x86_64 right in mock build?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
