Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147 --- Comment #8 from Andy Gospodarek <agosp...@redhat.com> 2009-09-18 17:05:30 EDT --- Once I look at the code I'll be able to comment (and maybe wouldn't need to ask this question), but what happens if there is no symlink created. I wonder if the udev rule should call another script that can call biosdevname (and/or another application) so that this solution is not x86[_64]-specific (which I understand it to be right now based on the fact that biosdevname wouldn't run on ppc or arm). So when taking about the working case, is the next step that our configuration files will be based on the '/dev/net/by-chassis-label/Embedded_NIC_1' names rather than ethN since those devices might change names depending on when the modules are loaded? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review