Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527046 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Janssen <thom...@fedoraproject.org> 2009-10-04 12:41:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > > > http://dev.perl.org/licenses/ > > So it's: GPLv2+ or Artistic > > No. Perl is licensed under GPLv1 or later and the Artistic license. > It should be "GPL+ or Artistic". See the perl packaging guidelines for > details. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Perl > > > MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in > > the > > review. > > ??? > You are doing the review, not me. My bad, i wasn't aware of the Packaging:Perl page (i should/will check about other pages as well) and i learned that the packager has to provide the rpmlint output as well. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
