Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512608


Thomas Spura <spur...@students.uni-mainz.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |spur...@students.uni-mainz.
                   |                            |de




--- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura <spur...@students.uni-mainz.de>  2009-10-20 
20:48:23 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> 
> These should all be okay.  

Hmm, no ;)

Just a few comments for now:

- Could you explain in the spec what your patch does?
- %global better than %define, see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define

- rpmlint:
  no-binary error, because there is no binary and your package is *not* noarch.
  Does it work to make it noarch and install anything into
%{_datadir}/mozilla/extensions/ ??

  only-non-binary-in-usr-lib warning would be gone with that, too.

I don't have the uncompressed-zip warning here (also 64-bit).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to