Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530754 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Kofler <ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org> 2009-11-03 18:55:42 EDT --- There's no need to split the package into several subpackages, and splitting %files with comments is also not needed. It's enough to use "and" in the License tag and to add a comment above it saying e.g.: # svg_regex.py is BSD, the rest is ASL 2.0 See also: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios According to that guideline page, it is sufficient to EITHER split %files with comments specifying the license OR use a comment like the above OR refer to a %doc file which tells what part is under what license (such files are sometimes shipped by upstream, in which case it's enough to reference them). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
