Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530617 Michael Schwendt <mschwe...@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mschwe...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt <mschwe...@gmail.com> 2009-11-10 17:10:25 EDT --- > %{_libdir}/*.a You build a static library only. You put it into the -devel package with a virtual -static package name. Then why do you run /sbin/ldconfig in post/postun scriptlets? > %package -n ixpc > Summary: Plan9 file protocol client > Group: Applications/System > Requires: %{name}-static = %{version}-%{release} Why does a client binary require the static library package? > make %{?_smp_mflags} CC="%{__cc} -c %{optflags}" This doesn't make the package adhere to the optflags guidelines. The project's internal CFLAGS override some of the optflags. It would be more clean if you could patch mk/gcc.mk and append $RPM_OPT_FLAGS (or %optflags) to $CFLAGS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
