Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528108





--- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>  2009-11-15 
13:33:17 EDT ---
For -2:

! BuildRequires
  - It is up to you, however usually all BuildRequires are
    written in the main package section.

* Parallel make
  - Still parallel make is missing in two places (if possible,
    please enable it)
---------------------------------------------------------
    90  sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g'
libtool
    91  sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool
    92  make
   116  sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g'
libtool
   117  sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool
   118  make
---------------------------------------------------------

* Timestamp
  - Please consider to use:
---------------------------------------------------------
make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p"
---------------------------------------------------------
    to keep timestamps on installed files. This method usually works
    for Makefiles generated by recent autotools.

* Directory ownership issue
  - Some directories are not owned by any packages, ref:
   
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership
    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories#Common_Mistakes
    On i686:
----------------------------------------------------------
/usr/lib/vuurmuur/plugins/
/usr/share/vuurmuur/
/usr/share/vuurmuur/config/
----------------------------------------------------------
    ! Note
      At least with rpm >= 4.7, $ rpm -ivv *.rpm will show such information
      like
----------------------------------------------------------
D: Vuurmuur-0.7-2.fc12.i686: Header SHA1 digest: OK
(84243c0b26f8e16c6b9f0bd2d14909735bf4f266)
D:   install: Vuurmuur-0.7-2.fc12 has 10 files, test = 0
D: opening  db index       /var/lib/rpm/Triggername create mode=0x42
Vuurmuur-0.7-2.fc12
D: ========== Directories not explicitly included in package:
D:          0 /usr/lib/
D:          1 /usr/lib/vuurmuur/plugins/
D:          2 /usr/share/doc/
D: ==========
D: /usr/lib/vuurmuur directory created with perms 0755, no context.
D: /usr/lib/vuurmuur/plugins directory created with perms 0755, no context.
D: fini      120777  1 (   0,   0)        20 /usr/lib/libvuurmuur.so.0;4b003ba3 
D: fini      100755  1 (   0,   0)    255652
/usr/lib/libvuurmuur.so.0.6.0;4b003ba3 
----------------------------------------------------------
    See the lines which shows "directory created with perms 0755, no context."

* Service
-----------------------------------------------------------
[r...@localhost ~]# service vuurmuur status
vuurmuur は停止しています
vuurmuur_log は停止しています
[r...@localhost ~]# service vuurmuur start 
Starting vuurmuur:Error (-1): could not open configfile
'/etc/vuurmuur/config.conf': No such file or directory (in: init_config).
Initializing config failed.
                                                           [失敗]

-----------------------------------------------------------
  ( Well, "は停止しています" is "is stopped", "失敗" is "FAILED",
    currently due to the bug in initscripts (bug 537682)
    I cannot change these messages into English... )
  - I think it is preferable to install the default /etc/vuurmuur/config.conf
    file (Fedora prefers that the package works as it is by default)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to