Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #6 from R P Herrold <herr...@owlriver.com> 2009-11-20 07:56:19 EDT --- this was what a private email to the maintainer referecned in #5 1) I see a lot of marketing cruft mentioning TRI-D in the files in the README* --- would it be possible to re-write these to remove the 'marketing' aspect? 2) I suspect that the 'changelog' entries convention of mentioning the V and R was not known to you: compare: * Mon Feb 11 2008 Frank Cusack <fr...@tri-dsystems.com> 3.1.0-1 to * Thu Nov 19 2009 Giuseppe Paterno' <gpate...@redhat.com> 3) the man page URL field is probably stale 4) the man page mentions two additional man pages not present: [herr...@dhcp-103 otpd]$ man gsmd No manual entry for gsmd [herr...@dhcp-103 otpd]$ man otppasswd No manual entry for otppasswd 5) a commented sample /etc/otppasswd is REALLY needed, to show what is possible, and marked as a (config) file 6) [herr...@dhcp-103 otpd]$ rpm -ql otpd | grep reqs The 'reqsynctool' binary -- probably living in either /usr/bin/ or /usr/sbin/ is missing? ===================== I an in a TUI only environment presently -- I will file this later today in the bugzilla, or you might do it for me? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
