Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550599 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-12-29 04:53:21 EDT --- I have not checked your latest srpm, however: (In reply to comment #2) > for license, should patch tarball (adding gplv2 file) and add patch to spec ? > - If you want to modify the tarball itself (i.e. include license text in the tarball) please release the new version (i.e. 0.1.0.1, for example) - If you want not to release the new version for now, for now include the license text as SourceX in srpm and package it into binary rpm with %doc. Anyway in the next version please include the license text in the tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
