Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: sparse - source code semantec parser used by the Linux kernel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212513 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-31 10:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > re: tarballs - doesn't honestly matter to me if the package has a daily > snapshot > tarball or a git clone'd tarball from a given day. I can put a comment in > that > snapshot tarballs are also available at DaveJ's site, or can use his tarballs > directly, either way. > > re: git in the alphatag, that's a figment of git clone method above and > Packaging/NamingGuidelines says to use it. I suppose if I used one of the > snapshot tarballs, that could be dropped, though NamingGuidelines doesn't > really > cover this scenario exactly (a non-project-released snapshot tarball). Spot? Well, the only reason I suggested the DaveJ snapshots was to basically avoid the git in the alphatag. It's not really a big deal to me. > Thanks for the additional review and comments. Package builds and works on > x86_64 for me too btw; I haven't tried ppc. I don't expect problems on ppc. It should just work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
