Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209311 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-02 13:43 EST ------- Thanks for the feedback! New build: Spec URL: http://dialogpalette.sourceforge.net/extras/fedora/espeak.spec SRPM URL: http://dialogpalette.sourceforge.net/extras/fedora/espeak-1.16-2.src.rpm Changes: - Added "install" target to makefile (makefile_install_target.patch) - Added patch to fix AMD64 sizeof(char *) assumption bug (upstream request ID 1588938) - Changed "portaudio" BuildRequires to "portaudio-devel" - Added patch to makefile to allow RPM_OPT_FLAGS - Added patch to replace all references to "speak" binary with "espeak" - Moved header files to /usr/include/espeak A few comments: Development headers: As mentioned in the ReadMe, the speak_lib.h provides the entire API to the libespeak shared library, and it references no other espeak-specific headers, so it is unecessary to include any other .h files. Binary voice data: The espeak program itself (formerly "speak" ;-) ) cannot compile the binary voice data (using the --compile arg) from source without a binary version of the phoneme tables being present. These phoneme table data files cannot be compiled from source using espeak/speak; they are compiled with a seperate program, "espeakedit", which is an interactive, GUI-based editing tool, also released under the GPL. There is no explicit license file for the binary voice data/phoneme tables, but since the source from which these are compiled is under the GPL, I don't think there are any legal problems. Patches: Depending on the feedback from this package build, I will push the makefile patches upstream (except for the RPM_OPT_FLAGS patch). espeak name: I agree that the "speak" name is troublesome, and have removed it from this rpm, as per suggestion. However, we must remember that some other applications may already be using eSpeak via the "speak" executable (especially since the shared library is a relatively new addition to espeak); this patch may break compatability with such programs. Some HOWTO's and guides on the Internet will also be (very slightly) incompatible with this naming scheme. There are ways around this, naturally, but I'm uncertain whether changing the name in the Fedora package is the best course of action. Nevertheless, depending on the feedback here, I will push upstream for the name change... :-) I've built this package in mock on FC6/i386. rpmlint is silent, except for the no-documentation stuff for the -devel subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review