Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216916 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-22 16:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Bad: > - Devel package should contains some documentation for developers. > I thins, that the stuff on /usr/doc/arpack-2.1/EXAMPLES shold be in > the developement package. Done, new specfile: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/arpack.spec (SRPM unchanged) > - Rpmlint complaints on installed package: It doesn't here (FC6). > rpmlint arpack > W: arpack undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libarpack.so.2.1 etime_ > W: arpack undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libarpack.so.2.1 slamch_ > W: arpack undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libarpack.so.2.1 cgemv_ > W: arpack undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libarpack.so.2.1 cscal_ > --- A lot of simular lines --- I have no idea what this is about. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
