Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218600 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-07 07:07 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPMS. + source files md5sum. No upstream is available. 0f1d30b02182ff1ec463b3bc37e9326c resapplet-0.1.1.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + COPYING included in %doc. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel or any subpackages exists + no .la files. + translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Desktop files are handled in usual way. - Not Used gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlet Add scriptlet update package. Cool applet tested successfully on FC6 i386 system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review