Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220393 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-27 17:01 EST ------- I did write the spec file myself, and validated the generated packages with rpmlint. (In fact, I started by using python's own rpm packaging tools, i.e. distutils / build_rpm, and then applied manual modifications to customize the generated spec file to obtain the desired sub-packages as required by the project structure.) I would appreciate if you could provide some detail as to what aspects of the packaging guidelines the existing spec file violates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review