Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-31 01:32 EST ------- Clarifiation: Are we running counter to the python module naming scheme in the naming guidance? Shouldnt it be python-poker-network and python-poker-client-lib because these are primarily python modules which can be used to develop multiple applications? poker-bot poker-server poker-web and poker2d look fine to me as names because they are the application level items which sit on top of pokernetwork or poker-client-lib. Did this naming issue come up with poker-engine? I'm not convinced this is enough to block on, especially now that poker-engine is already in the tree. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
