Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222220 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-11 16:50 EST ------- More importantly, one should note that the example: desktop-file-install --vendor="" \ --dir=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/<vendor_id> \ %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/applications/<vendor_id>/foo.desktop Is (almost) a no-op, other than serving as a sanity-check/validator for the .desktop file (ie, dfi will barf if it finds something non-compliant). Now, how to (re)word this to make it clear fdi is not a MUST item, while at the same time maximizing confusion... (: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
