Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: bibletime - BibleTime is a frontend for the SWORD Bible Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222456 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-13 12:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > With the find_lang... I think again this is probably a no-op, as I believe > that the i18n stuff is in a separate tarball and not in the main BT > distribution. Now thinking about it again, I believe you're right. Considering that the review guildelines says locale files must not be explicitly listed, and since it doesn't hurt, I think it can stay. > Almost there - I hope! Yes. GOOD: * rmplint silent on mock srpm * rpmlint warning on mock built binary can be ignored (targets really exist); (W: bibletime dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/bibletime/handbook/common ../../common W: bibletime devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/bibletimeinterface.h - A separate -devel subpackage is not needed for this, I believe. Moreso BT doesn't ship any library W: bibletime dangling-relative-symlink) /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/bibletime/howto/common ../../common * source tarball matches upstream's md5sum: b2b8b624d21d397201aec742d43501e5 bibletime-1.6.2.tar.bz2 * package name meets the Package Naming Guidelines. * Satifies the Packaging Guidelines. * Builds in mock (x86_64 development) * Installs and works OK (for me at least) * License: GPL * Spec file generally OK. APPROVED. It'll be nice to include the 'Changelog' with the README and License in the %doc section before/after you eventually import it into CVS. Also please don't forget the bibletime-i18n you promised. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review