Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-27 13:22 EST ------- We've discussed this a bit on IRC, and I think I've found a reasonable solution. One selinux subpackage will be needed (poker-selinux), and it will contain only the selinux policy files, not the wrapper scripts. poker-selinux will not need 'Requires: poker-server'. Since the wrapper scripts are generic enough to be used when selinux is enabled or disabled, there doesn't need to be a conditional in the init script to call them if they are present. The wrapper scripts can safely move to the corresponding poker-bot and poker-server subpackages. poker-web requires the selinux policies in order to function, since it requires giving permission to httpd to connect to the pokerd_port_t ports. So poker-web will need "Requires: poker-selinux". If poker-web is installed with poker-server and/or poker-bot, this will enforce selinux protection on those two packages as well. The protection for poker-bot/poker-server can be disabled, however, by using 'setsebool pokerd_disable_trans on' without affecting the selinux rules needed for poker-web. But if poker-server/poker-bot are installed without poker-web, then the selinux protection is only available if the admin installs poker-selinux manually. I'm testing out these changes now and will attach updates for the spec file and init scripts when ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review