Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: aspell-pl


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225280


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]    |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-02-03 17:46 EST -------
excellent..... (In reply to comment #4)
> Created an attachment (id=147277)
 --> 
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=147277&action=view) 
[edit]
> aspell-pl-6.0-2.20061121
> 
> New, prettier spec file ;)

I was going to start marching my way through these aspell library packages as
part of the merge review. The new build section you added to enable compression
appears to be a general item that I can replicate in all the specs for all the
libs.  Would you agree?

I'm going to do the review of your new spec file... and make that the basis of
my merge review.  The compression is just too damn good to not use for all the
dictionaries.

-jef

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to