Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: hunspell-nl - Dutch hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228490 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-13 19:25 EST ------- upstreamid is wrong, should be 20-Jul-2005 (archive date) or 17/19-Jul-2005 (files' date) GOOD - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream , sha1sum 9f5432aeb20ab7e9a3c72877b71056a33b2bd9ba nl_NL.zip - the package builds in mock for devel/x86_64, generates a noarch (which is consistent with the fact that basically it includes only 3 text files) - the license GPL stated in the tag is the same as the web site and the included documentation say; it is not included in the package because upstream did not include it either - there are only 2 files (word lists) + a short doc with instructions and license clearance, so no need for -doc and no .la, .pc, static files - no missing BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all files/directories that it creates, does not take ownership of other files/dirs - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - rpmlint output is silent - code, not content - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file APPROVED but please fix the version before uploading to CVS; you should also ask upstream to include the GPL license in the archive -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
