Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: yum


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226666


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[EMAIL PROTECTED]




------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-02-14 04:19 EST -------
Issues:

* Why is it a BuildRequires: python and not Buildrequires: python-devel?

* it seems to me that the python-devel BuildRequires should be versionned
then Requires: python >= 2.4 would be autodetected 

* Prereq should be replaced with Requires(preun) and so on...

* Is the conflict really needed? pirut >= 1.1.4 should requires a
recent enough yum version.

suggestions:

* use %defattr(-, root, root, -) instead of %defattr(-, root, root)

* prefix plugin.conf source file by a disambiguating prefix like
yum-plugin.conf

* remove the -f to be notified when the file doesn't exist/change name...
rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_sysconfdir}/yum/yum.conf

* there is an occurence of /etc hardcoded in the specfile, it could be
  %_sysconfdir. However the upstream Makefiles and programs have many
  paths hardcoded so this is not really an issue. (There is also a /var
  and some /usr, but I guess they are also hardcoded in the package).

* It seems to me that BuildArch is more used that BuildArchitectures

* There is no need of / after $RPM_BUILD_ROOT

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to