Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ru - Russian hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228496 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-14 05:58 EST ------- GOOD - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream , sha1sum 176b8983980395c8e386884f4f08a6a5bb0aed63 ru_RU.zip - the package builds in mock for devel/x86_64, generates a noarch (which is consistent with the fact that basically it includes only 3 text files) - the license BSD stated in the tag is the same as the web site says; it is not included in the package because upstream does not include it either; however a doc is included which says: "Permission to use, copy, redistribute is granted. Permission to redistribute modifications in patch form is granted. Permission to redistribute binaries made of modified sources is granted. All other rights reserved." I guess this ressembles BSD well enough. - there are only 2 files (word lists) + a short doc with instructions and license clearance, so no need for -doc and no .la, .pc, static files - no missing BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all files/directories that it creates, does not take ownership of other files/dirs - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - rpmlint output is silent - code, not content - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
