Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: expect


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225743





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-02-14 16:47 EST -------
I can't say for sure, but perhaps this helps:

  $ rpmlint -I invalid-soname
  invalid-soname :
  The soname of the library is neither of the form lib<libname>.so.<major> or
  lib<libname>-<major>.so.

The regexp used for the check is:

  ^lib.+(\.so\.[\.0-9]+|-[\.0-9]+\.so)$

Someone more familiar with sonames should to comment on whether there's
something wrong with libexpect5.43.so.  My guess would be no, don't change it,
it's just unusual - cases like that are more often found in form like
libexpect5-43.so or libexpect-5.43.so.  Perhaps ask upstream what they think and
if they'd like to change towards a more usual looking sonames for future 
releases?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to