Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: TMDA - Tagged Message Delivery Agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217654 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-17 13:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > - Usually the dependency against main package should be release specific. > i.e. Duh, I knew that :-/ > * Cosmetic issue: consistent macro use > - Well, you use both > %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d > %{_initrddir} Good catch, I will fix that. > - Maybe the following documents are useful? > NEWS (usually this should be included) I will add this. > * For -emacs package: > - Well, I don't think it is useful to split only one file with 27K > and to create another package with have no dependency essentially. > And.. tmda.el is installed in main package as a documentation. > > IMO simply unifying .el file into main package and having both > %{_datadir}/emacs and %{_datadir}/emacs/site-lisp directories owned > also by main package, removing emacs dependency is simpler. Isn't this contrary to the same argument being used against logrotate scripts now? The packaging guidelines (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-a5931a7372c4a00065713430984fa5875513e6d4), one file and directory ownership say: "The rule of thumb is that your package should own all of the directories it creates except those owned by packages which your package depends on." If I create a subpackage, it has two beneficial effects: 1) I don't break the rules and make exceptions for my package. 2) I don't drag in emacs dependencies to the main package. > And.. tmda.el is installed in main package as a documentation. And to address this specifically... Yes, it came from documentation, to add additional functionality as I did with print{cdb,dbm}. We always have the option to just include it in %docs and not pull it in like I do. What do you think about that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review