Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: elektra - A key/value pair database to store software configurations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209906 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-12 11:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > I'm working on allowing oyranos to uses the dynamic lib - i may start a review > if i have some work in progress... Indeed not using the internal lib is a must. > The -static package bundles a binary file (with it own static lib) It is here > in > case of problems and may not be use normally. I wonder if it shouldn't be > kept? I consider that acceptable, especially since upstream supports it. I don't insist on having it either, although I think it would certainly match better the user expectations. > Usually if a package bundles a static lib, i must be approved by FESCo. I > expect > it won't be necessary... I personally don't adhere to that guideline, for the reason that I think that FESCo members are less qualified to judge on that matter than packagers who know more about the uses of the package, and also because it seems to me that FESCo should never ever have to look at a class of package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
