Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: latexmk - a make-like utility for LaTeX documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229377 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 16:11 EST ------- I just discovered that FC7 is using texlive to replace the now defunct tetex. My spec file refers to tetex and tetex-devel. What is the preferred solution? Should I Require the actual binaries (/usr/bin/latex, /usr/bin/pdflatex, etc.), or use %if to Require tetex for FC6 and earlier and texlive for FC7 and later? If the latter, how do I distinguish between <= FC6 and >= FC7? I suppose I need to account for the FC7 test releases as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
