Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234750 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-06 23:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > (In reply to comment #18) > > In my specs I do all these steps this way: > > %prep > > %setup -q -c -T -n %{name}-%{version} > > %setup -q -D -T -n %{name}-%{version} -a0 > > > > Erm why not just: > %prep > %setup -q -c > > That has exactly the same effect. Yes, but only if a package has exactly one source-tarball. When a package has several source-tarballs (like my gcc-specs), my construct is more flexible (I generate the specs) > > Finally: As you already know, I dislike a toolchains using an architecture > > (avr) > > as their target > > I know, but as long as almost the whole world does it like this I'm > not planning on changing this. Well, ... who is this whole world you are referring to? Any GNU toolchain developer will tell you that using an architecture as target is not a clever decision. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
