Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239884 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-12 05:41 EST ------- Freeform review additions: - please also use -m 0755 at directory install time - it would be nice if the metadata declaration order followed the official Fedora template - please add a FAQ or at least the contact in charge of liberation fonts as the referenced site has limited info and no contact information. In particular everyone involved in FLOSS fonts would like to know the rationale behind GPL choice when the painfully achieved consensus was to go OFL for all projects - please drop a fontconfig configuration file in /etc/fonts/conf.d/ containing at least the "assign generic names" bit of the dejavu-lgc one. After distussion on IRC with behdad the right prio is probably between dejavu-lgc and other fonts (595 unless dejavu-lgc moves to 58) - relying on /etc/fonts/conf.d/30-aliases-fedora.conf means Conflicting with fontconfig packages that do not include liberation info (major PITA). Consider working with behdad to split this file in font-specific ones (/etc/fonts/conf.d/30-001-fedora-helvetica-alias-liberation.conf, /etc/fonts/conf.d/30-002-fedora-helvetica-alias-nimbus.conf etc) so next time a new font package can just drop his own file there instead of relying on a fontconfig update -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
