Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-17 06:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #28) > Rawhide it is then. If the pam support doesn't make its way before fedora 8 release, you'll have to make sure that it isn't tagged as a fedora 8 package, since the devel (rawhide) packages become automatically part of the next fedora release, unless something is done to avoid it. > I think so ? Package is reviewed/approved (Comment #19), so that would > probably > be next ? Looks like Jochen is not a sponsor (correct me, Jochen if I am wrong), but I am. You seem to understand the guidelines enough, I researched a bit on the net, on redhat bugzilla about you, you have a rather good record, so there is no issue about competence. The main issue regarding sponsoring (in my opinion) is to avoid sponsoring people that lose rapidly interest in fedora and leave the project with orphaned packages behind. I think that it shouldn't be the case with you, so I am ready to sponsor you. I'd also appreciate being co-maintainer for this package if you are ok, since it shares some similarities with wdm. In the meantime I added the FE-NEEDSPONSOR blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
