Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: perl-PDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226275 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-09 16:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > > However, rpmlint is still complaining about: > > W: perl-PDL unversioned-explicit-provides perl(PDL::Config) > etc... > > And company. Wouldn't it be better to version these with the same version as > perl-PDL? Well, the vast majority of the automatic perl provides are unversioned too, so my take would be to leave the version out for now. > also rpmlint complains about: > > W: perl-PDL devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/PDL/Core/pdlsimple.h > etc... > > We could probably move these to a perl-PDL-devel package, if they aren't > needed > at runtime. > Not according to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Perl#head-b867c6067f009c5ea8f21723d028e8b40fae15c7 Some more stuff: - I've got perl-ExtUtils-F77 added to Fedora, so we can add: BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::F77) BuildRequires: gcc-gfortran I'll also attach a patch that uses the RPM_OPT_FLAGS and -fPIC to compile to fortran code, and fixes a test for gfortran/f77 compatibility. This allows PDL::Slatec to build, so we can remove that from the listed Provides. - Still need BuildRequires: libGLU-devel - Looks like the License should be re-examined and the tag updated. Possibly "GPL+ or Artistic" though some files seem a little different. - Looks like we need to add Provides: perl(PDL::Graphics::TriD::Objects) - We need to filter perl(Win32::DDE::Client) from Requires now. - Don't forget to bump release and add changelog entries! I'll attach a patch for my spec changes as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
