Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-21 07:46 EST ------- The conflict with tetex-tex4ht should be fixed in devel. For previous versions I don't want to make changes, you should add a conflict. The package installs passivetex and some sty, this shouldn't be: /usr/share/dblatex/latex/misc/attachfile.sty /usr/share/dblatex/latex/misc/bibtopic.sty /usr/share/dblatex/latex/misc/enumitem.sty /usr/share/dblatex/latex/misc/multirow2.sty /usr/share/dblatex/latex/misc/passivetex /usr/share/dblatex/latex/misc/passivetex/LICENSE /usr/share/dblatex/latex/misc/passivetex/dummyels.sty /usr/share/dblatex/latex/misc/passivetex/unicode.sty /usr/share/dblatex/latex/misc/ragged2e.sty attachfile.sty is not in tetex, and therefore should be packaged. Maybe it is in texlive, in that case, it could be acceptable to ship the one in dblatex (but in texmf) waiting for this style file to enter fedora through texlive. In my spec I did: # these are already in tetex-latex: for file in bibtopic.sty enumitem.sty ragged2e.sty passivetex/; do rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/dblatex/latex/misc/$file done The tex files (especially the .sty) should be below /usr/share/texmf instead of in /usr/share/dblatex/. The xsl stylesheets should also be in xsl stylesheet directories. I used %{_datadir}/sgml/docbook/xsl-stylesheets/dblatex/ It is not that obvious since it seems that dblatex uses xsl files for other purposes than xsltproc call, to retrieve the version. However in the debian package the xsl files are in xsl directory and I can't see any obvious patching. It would be better not to use the included which, but system python-which. In my srpm there is a very simple patch to use system which instead of the one from contrib. You can apply the debian patch it only creates things below a debian directory, but I haven't found many interesting things in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
