Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz 
Configuration System


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247408





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-10-18 08:39 EST -------
Well, although F8 freeze has already come, I hope ccsm
(and then also this package) can be included before
F8 is released.

My comments for 0.6.0-0.2.XXXXXX

* Seemingly too long name
  - rpmlint complains that the name of binary rpms are too
    long.
--------------------------------------------------------------
$ rpmlint *rpm
compizconfig-python.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog
0.6.0-2.20071018git0e80b1 0.6.0-0.2.20071018git0e80b1.fc8
compizconfig-python-debuginfo.i386: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet
compizconfig-python-debuginfo-0.6.0-0.2.20071018git0e80b1.fc8.i386.rpm
compizconfig-python-devel.i386: W: no-documentation
compizconfig-python-devel.i386: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet
compizconfig-python-devel-0.6.0-0.2.20071018git0e80b1.fc8.i386.rpm
$ rpmlint -I filename-too-long-for-joliet
filename-too-long-for-joliet :
This filename is too long to fit on a joliet filesystem (limit is 64 unicode 
chars).
--------------------------------------------------------------
    Please consider to shorten the rpms' name.

* .pc file
  - Is this .pc file (and then -devel subpackage) really needed?
    * -devel package does not contain any libraries or header files
    * This file does not seem to be used to rebuild ccsm.

! COPYING
  - Well, the source codes are actually under LGPLv2+, however COPYING
    file is GPL. The license tag can be LGPLv2+, however please ask the
    developer to change COPYING file (this is not a blocker).


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to