Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: fxload - A helper program to download firmware into FX and FX2 EZ-USB devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=386341 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-16 18:16 EST ------- Re comment 2: Yes, you're correct, I really shouldn't distribute it either as it appears to stand. However, I was searching around for information on whether a different version existed with a better license, and found this: http://marc.info/?l=linux-hotplug-devel&m=112957485713095&w=4 The referenced CVS browse URL has been moved to: http://linux-hotplug.cvs.sourceforge.net/linux-hotplug/fxload/a3load.hex?revision=1.1&view=markup Here, Greg K-H is claiming that with this license, it's fine to distribute it. I'm not quite sure how he comes to that opinion. Perhaps it's because the hex file is being distributed with SW that's specifically to drive a USB-FX device? Who could resolve this question? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
