Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: sgml-common https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226415 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-19 08:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > Anyway looks good now, except that the xml-common url doesn't > correspond at all with the xml-common package. This url, however > links to some explanations, and ultimately to files in > http://www.w3.org/2003/entities/2007/ Actually I think there is no free completely corresponding url for sgml-common and xml-common. Old swiss page with iso 8879 was not 100% correct too, because in sgml-common and xml-common is only subset of full set of entities. Anyway - I think the best way is to keep it as it is done now - with link to w3.org entities. > Sone of these files are in docbook-dtds. I don't know about others. > Should they be shipped somehow? Which files do you mean? I agree that docbook-dtds corresponds somehow with sgml-common/xml-common entities - as both are subsets docbook entities. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
