Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: tomcat6 - Apache Servlet/JSP Engine, RI for Servlet 2.5/JSP 2.1 API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435829 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-02 11:27 EST ------- There are a few unversioned porvides/obseletes: tomcat6.src:129: W: unversioned-explicit-provides jsp tomcat6.src:130: W: unversioned-explicit-provides jsp21 tomcat6.src:155: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes servletapi6 tomcat6.src:156: W: unversioned-explicit-provides servletapi6 tomcat6.src:157: W: unversioned-explicit-provides servlet tomcat6.src:158: W: unversioned-explicit-provides servlet6 tomcat6.src:159: W: unversioned-explicit-provides servlet25 license should be ASL 2.0, and rpmlint will stop complaining coreutils doesn't need to be listed as BuildRequires. Shouldn't the content in the docs-webapp package be marked as %doc? in tomcat6-6.0.wrapper, /usr/share/java-utils/java-functions is sourced without a check if it exists. With regards to the issues that you mentioned earlier: - use of /srv - this is fixed, right? - initscript does not use standard start/stop functions (e.g., `daemon') - what was the reason that we do not use the standard start/stop functions? - upstream shell scripts do not find Java according to JPackage standard - are these fixed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
