Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442507 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-06 00:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > As long there is the understanding that only one elfspe binary, either 32bit > or > 64bit, can be installed, I don't think there is a real issue. It looks like the same situation as other executable packages, such as bash, coreutils, ppc64-utils, etc. The ppc64 repository (development/ppc64/, releases/9/Everything/ppc64/, etc) have only ppc64 packages, so I thought that the ppc64 package should be built for ppc64 targets. Is it unnecessary to care about this case? > My understanding is, that the ADA compiler can produce either 32bit or 64bit > binaries depending on how the ADA compiler itself was built. > From that perspective, choosing the 64bit seems the better choice. But I don't > have neither a strong opinion nor a strong background in this area. Hmm, the Fedora's ppc repository provides only 32bit version of libgnat, and the ppc64 repository provides no libgnat, though the gnat compiler seems to be able to generate both of 32bit and 64bit object files... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
