Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-27 03:46 EST ------- rpmlint says: un-fonts-core.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0.2-080608-1 1.0-1.fc9 How about using the latest released 1.0.2-080608 tarball? (Also since you note it in the changelog.:) I think the version can be just 1.0.2 and then the datestamp can go into the release field following http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines. Probably %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{name} %define archivename un-fonts Name: un-fonts-core would be ok for this package. un-fonts-core.src: W: invalid-license GPL v2 The license url http://korea.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.ko.html embedded in the ttf fonts is broken. Could you please contact upstream to clarify their intention on the GPL version. It would be better if the fonts files just stated the GPL version (eg "version 2 or later") than referring to a url which might change or disappear. Anyway currently the License tag should be GPLv2+ or maybe GPLv2. (There seems to be a translation at http://korea.gnu.org/documents/copyleft/gpl.ko.html but again Fedora, like the FSF, would not recognise the unofficial translation. So it does not really help.) You don't use xorg-x11-font-utils or ttmkfdir so those buildrequires can be dropped. It would be good to have a bit more information in the description. There can also be summary and description in Korean added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
