Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: R-RSQLite - SQLite Interface for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450686 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ Bug 450686 depends on bug 450685, which changed state. Bug 450685 Summary: Review Request: R-DBI - Database Interface for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450685 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-29 13:14 EST ------- I'd suggest using http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/RSQLite/index.html for the URL, as it actually has some information about the package. * source files match upstream: 8eb6faf25b494db17c74e0a83099839796539ae059cc8fd58fbac13aac2c63d8 RSQLite_0.6-9.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: RSQLite.so()(64bit) R-RSQLite = 0.6-3.fc10 = /bin/bash /bin/sh R R-DBI libR.so()(64bit) * %check is present and all tests pass. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets OK (R package registration) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review