Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review-Request: mon - General-purpose resource monitoring system Alias: mon-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455168 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-13 11:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Changing the upstream name is out of question here, I'd say, especially in > case > of a well-established project with generally recognized name. Picking the > package name of first come -- first serve basis is perfectly just here. No, it is not. The name should always be specific. First come first serve is not playing nice with other potential softwares. That being said, this project is the oldest and well established, so the name should certainly be used for that project. But still, contacting upstream about the genericity of the name would seem to be better to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
