Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: why - Why software verification platform


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456398





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-07-24 17:18 EST -------
> * I believe you're missing some "Requires:".  I could "yum erase tcl tk",
>   and still install ALL the programs (including gwhy).  rpm can 
automatically
>   deduce a lot of dependencies from library information, but it will miss
>   stuff (e.g., stuff invoked via shell/command line).  I was expecting
>   gwhy, at least, to have more dependencies.  I think that's a blocker.

gwhy has a lot of requires (as automatically determined by the RPM build 
system):

/bin/sh
libatk-1.0.so.0
libc.so.6
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.2)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)
libcairo.so.2
libdl.so.2
libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.0)
libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.1)
libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0
libglib-2.0.so.0
libgmodule-2.0.so.0
libgobject-2.0.so.0
libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
libm.so.6
libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)
libpango-1.0.so.0
libpangocairo-1.0.so.0
libpthread.so.0
libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0)
libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.1)
libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2)
libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.3.2)
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rtld(GNU_HASH)
why
zenity

What other ones would it have? There are no packages "tcl" or "tk"... it 
certainly doesn't require "tcllib" and "tklib". Furthermore, gwhy really 
depends on gtk, not tk (which it does indeed appropriately require as above). 
I'm pretty sure rpmbuild indeed saw that gwhy was just a shell script that 
calls gwhy-bin (since running find-requires on just gwhy produces /bin/sh). 
Was there something else you had in mind?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to