Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458660 --- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-18 04:11:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > I know we use in some packages cyclic dependencies. > But here should be ok to remove them. Resolving the cyclic build-dep is a MUSTFIX, otherwise you won't be able to bootstrap this package. Afterwards, once this package in Fedora, and when it's being built incrementally, cyclic deps are tolerable. (The normal way to circumvent such issues is add build-conditionals (use %_with_*/%_without_* inside of the *.spec to support rpmbuild --with/--without) In any case you should file a bug upstream. It's an upstream design flaw. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
