Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458660





--- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  2008-08-18 04:11:44 EDT 
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I know we use in some packages cyclic dependencies.
> But here should be ok to remove them.
Resolving the cyclic build-dep is a MUSTFIX, otherwise you won't be able to
bootstrap this package.

Afterwards, once this package in Fedora, and when it's being built
incrementally, cyclic deps are tolerable. (The normal way to circumvent such
issues is add build-conditionals (use %_with_*/%_without_* inside of the *.spec
to support rpmbuild --with/--without)

In any case you should file  a bug upstream. It's an upstream design flaw.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to