Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457288 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-19 19:04:02 EDT --- This does build, but rpmlint complains about many undefined-non-weak-symbols (for things that should be in libm and such). I don't know if this is a real issue or not. It also complains: snobol-devel.x86_64: E: no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib64/libsnobol.so and indeed libsnobol.so seems to be just a file instead of the expected symlink. There's also this near the end of the build: *** WARNING: identical binaries are copied, not linked: /usr/lib64/libsnobol.so.4 and /usr/lib64/libsnobol.so Seems that the install command doesn't seem to preserve symlinks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
