Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 --- Comment #33 from Philip Prindeville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-02 19:29:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > (In reply to comment #26) > > (In reply to comment #22) > > > non-formal review: > > > > > > 4) Source: http://apache.webthing.com/mod_proxy_html/mod_proxy_html.tgz > > > is bad - do upstream not provide versioned URLs? > > > > Unfortunately, they do not. > > upstream should be educated then ;) > > You'll need to work around that and version the tarball manually, I think this > is covered in the wiki somewhere. Upstream has cooperated in adding numbered versions. All other issues have been addressed. Results from rpmlint: $ rpmlint mod_proxy_html.spec ../RPMS/i386/mod_proxy_html-debuginfo-3.0.1-7.fc8.i386.rpm 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
