Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459916 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-03 04:15:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Ah, interesting question. > > This is intentional, but hopefully there's a cleaner way to do it. > A user installing 'dfarc', the front-end, will want to install freedink as > well. Similarly, somebody installing 'freedink' will want to install the > front-end to play extensions or start the game in windowed mode (for example). For me it seems that you are saying - With freedink we can play some games, however some additional functions (like some extentions, modes in window mode) are not available - With freedink-dfarc we can play freedink in some additional effects, however freedink-dfrac always requires freedink. If I am correct, I recommend to remove "Requires: (freedink-)dfarc" from freedink srpm and keep "Requires: freedink" in freedink-dfarc srpm. By the way, share/README and COPYING.DFArc-2.0 seem to be saying that share/pixmaps/dfarc.png is licensed under COPYING.DFArc-2.0 and it doesn't seem COPYING.DFArc-2.0 is enough free. How do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
