Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461757 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Cagney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-22 12:27:17 EDT --- Thanks for the updated file! (In reply to comment #10) > Created an attachment (id=317030) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=317030) [details] > modified SPEC file to solve rpmlint messages > > Here is modified SPEC file for you to simplify your work. But still rpmlint > gives message with this new release as > libdwarf.i386: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libdwarf.so Looking around I found a rule from another code base that uses: .a.so: soname=`basename [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; \ $(CC) -shared -o [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ -Wl,--whole-archive,$<,--no-whole-archive \ -Wl,--soname,$$soname,-z,-defs if readelf -d [EMAIL PROTECTED] | fgrep -q TEXTREL; then exit 1; fi mv [EMAIL PROTECTED] $@ to build the .so; note the --soname option passed to LD (via gcc's -Wl). I'm guessing I need to tweak things specify that; I'll check that out. If its needed I'll also give the shared library a version number; might as well fix that as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
