Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461007





--- Comment #6 from Rakesh Pandit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  2008-09-26 04:00:42 EDT 
---
Review:

NA = Not applicable, ! = requires attention, x = passed 


Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=845010

source from project resource:
md5sum libftdi-0.14.tar.gz 
43f20478e725aa5ba6cdae311ca0593d  libftdi-0.14.tar.gz

source from srpm:
md5sum libftdi-0.14.tar.gz 
43f20478e725aa5ba6cdae311ca0593d  libftdi/libftdi-0.14.tar.gz

RPMLINT: CLEAN

[EMAIL PROTECTED] SRPMS]$ rpmlint libftdi-0.14-1.fc9.src.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] i386]$ rpmlint libftdi-0.14-1.fc9.i386.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] i386]$ rpmlint libftdi-devel-0.14-1.fc9.i386.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] i386]$ rpmlint libftdi-0.14-1.fc9.i386.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.


Required:
[x] package name
[x] package base name and spec name - same
[x] packaging guidelines
[x] license file included
[x] license correct
[x] spec legible & in American english
[x] md5sum checked source
[x] package compiled on all primary architectures
[x] Buildrequires tag - okay
[NA] locale
[NA] desktop file - GUI
[x] shared library - ldconfig called in %post and %postun
[x] owns all directories it creates
[x] permissions in %defattr correct
[x] %clean and %install section have 'rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT'
[x] %doc files don't have any dependency on other section of package
[!] Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for
directory ownership and usability). 
     You should remove pkgconfig from BuildRequires and put it in Requires
      Moreover in devel package requires 
      Requires:       %{name} = %{version}-%{release} is enough  
[x] valid encoding

Optional:
[x] description and summary fine
[NA] license file query
[x] package functioning - okay
[NA] any scripts 
[x] no dependencies outside FHS guideline paths
[x] .pc file in devel pkg  

Summary: other then one point mentioned in [!] above - everything looks okay

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to